Back to top class since 2012 on the Regal, Buick GM's legendary GS badge sleepiest brand has injected some much-needed cred. (Letters soon. Can be applied to a lot of models) sports and luxurious European style serving up the balance, the Regal GS 50 horsepower and 35 lb- and pillows supplied 2.0-liter turbo four for boasted its own settings middle-class Regal Turbo on the same engine ft of torque. But an updated two models for renewal in 2014 powerplant installed on a Regal Turbo powered GS has weakened but sees a move. Although not suffer from performance swap GS brings a powerful turbo Regal value per question.
More or less power, You Decide
The new engine twin-scroll turbocharger, a forged steel crankshaft, the 2.0-liter four-cylinder direct injection and twin balance shafts. 24 psi maximum boost engine produces 259 horsepower and 295 lb-ft of torque; The Turbo 39 horsepower and 35 lb-ft wins GS, so that 11 horses (torque remains the same) will see a drop. Different engine maps GS turbo has the maximum torque at 2500 rpm to 3000 production, but horsepower in both versions thins after a 5300-rpm peak. Six-speed manual gearbox still the default choice and 6T70 six-speed automatic GM's front-wheel drive transmission for a single Turbos for GS GS AWD models are presented.
This year also new, optional Haldex all-wheel-drive system can bring the shuttle up to 90 percent power to the rear wheels as well as apportion torque to the rear axle on both sides of the electronic limited slip differential. As the title of this story may have been able to, we versions of Turbo and GS tested with this system. Snowbelters and appeal among fattening MSRPs (additional to Turbo GS $ 2,175, $ 2,365) with support AWD hardware front-wheel-drive versions than our scale in more than 300 over the two-ton mark weight puts both models we tested.
2014 estimates of 24 mpg on FWD models no longer collects together, despite their extra weight as it did in 2013 for front-drive turbocharged AWD Regals same 22 mpg EPA combined degree obtained. Our test car was able AWD Turbo AWD GS 19 and 20 mpg in the real world, gathered from a previous front-drive test car with similar numbers.
What Extra Weight?
AWD Turbo and GS lighter and faster for 60 and automatic, front-drive than running the quarter mile mark of the preceding, also occur fluff own test track. That is 6.6 seconds and the 2014 Turbo (against 6.4 and 15.0), the new GS and 6.2 and 14.7 seconds (versus 7.5 and 15.7) is for 15 straight. GS does not come fast by the seat of your pants, but it is slightly lower torque peak, four-wheel drive system and optional 20-inch wheels on the sticky Pirelli P Zero tires help it out a series of quick hole. This is after our first test car suffered a catastrophic engine failure due to faulty connecting rod bearings second, it is worth noting that you have to test essentially the same GS.
Larger front brakes (Brembo wearing brand) and oil cylinders 70 mph fade-free stops in 153 feet to come, provide a decelerativ advantage over GS Turbo. every season-shod foot number 163 Turbo returned. Both models are silent as to the stable and drag-limited top speed. We were unable to measure lateral grip the new AWD system, but 0.85 g (Turbo) and 0.90 g (Pirellis GS) has published front-drive versions, expect much to change.
Prepared by Performance
All-wheel drive Regals GS front of Hi-P steer torque struts and continue the fight in the hands of a control lever, instead of multiple deployments of FWD car's rear suspension. Such as launches, mining rush through a narrow corner drama-free and cars, thanks to excellent traction and minimal turbo lag (Turbo. There are conventional supports), but Hi-P is a greater sense of confidence to strut gift racier Regal do turn-in. GSA also feels sharper and more accustomed to requests marginal helm.
No comments:
Post a Comment